Aufklärungspflichten in der Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

In Deutschland erkranken jährlich etwa 70 000 Frauen neu an Brustkrebs [2]. Onkologische Operationen der Mamma sind deshalb von großer Bedeutung. Das ästhetische Ergebnis spielt für die Patientinnen eine große Rolle. Es gilt aber, das Spannungsfeld zwischen onkologischer Sicherheit und maximal möglicher Lebensqualität für die Patientin zu gewährleisten. Dieser Beitrag klärt über die Risiken der verschiedenen Operationen an der weiblichen Brust auf.

• Literatur

• 1 Schütz F, Sohn C, Wallwiener M. et al. Aufklärungspflichten in der Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Teil 1: Allgemeine Aspekte medizinischer Aufklärungen. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2017; 77: 592-597
• 2 Robert Koch-Institut; Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister in Deutschland e.V., Hrsg. Krebs in Deutschland 2011/2012. 10. Ausgabe. Berlin: 2015
• 3 Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Winer EP. et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncol 2017; 28: 1700-1712 doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx308
• 4 National German Guideline (S3): Breast reconstruction with autologous tissue. 2015. AWMF Registry No. 015/075. Online: http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/015-075.html Stand: 29.10.2017
• 5 Moran MS, Colasanto JM, Haffty BG. et al. Effects of breast-conserving therapy on lactation after pregnancy. Cancer J 2005; 11: 399-403
• 6 Azim jr. HA, Bellettini G, Liptrott SJ. et al. Breastfeeding in breast cancer survivors: pattern, behaviour and effect on breast cancer outcome. Breast 2010; 19: 527-531 doi:10.1016/j.breast.2010.05.018
• 7 Mejdahl MK, Andersen KG, Gartner R. et al. Persistent pain and sensory disturbances after treatment for breast cancer: six year nationwide follow-up study. BMJ 2013; 346: f1865 doi:10.1136/bmj.f1865
• 8 Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gynäkologische Onkologie AGO. Onkoplastische und Rekonstruktive Mammachirurgie. Online: https://www.ago-online.de/fileadmin/downloads/leitlinien/mamma/2017-03/AGO_deutsch/PDF_Einzeldateien_deutsch/2017D 09_Onkoplastische und rekonstruktive Mammachirurgie.pdf Stand: 29.10.2017
• 9 Gahm J, Hansson P, Brandberg Y. et al. Breast sensibility after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1521-1527 doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2013.06.054
• 10 Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R. et al. Risk factors associated with recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy for invasive and intraepithelial neoplasia. Ann Oncol 2012; 23: 2053-2058 doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr566
• 11 Shimo A, Tsugawa K, Tsuchiya S. et al. Oncologic outcomes and technical considerations of nipple-sparing mastectomies in breast cancer: experience of 425 cases from a single institution. Breast Cancer 2016; 23: 851-860 doi:10.1007/s12282-015-0651-6
• 12 De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE. et al. Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22: 3241-3249 doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4739-1
• 13 Marta GN, Poortmans P, de Barros AC. et al. Multidisciplinary international survey of post-operative radiation therapy practices after nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.09.014.
• 14 Irwin GW, Black A, Refsum SE. et al. Skin-reducing mastectomy and one-stage implant reconstruction with a myodermal flap: a safe and effective technique in risk-reducing and therapeutic mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66: 1188-1194 doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.048
• 15 Basta MN, Gerety PA, Serletti JM. et al. A systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis of outcomes following direct-to-implant versus conventional two-stage implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136: 1135-1144 doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001749
• 16 Yan C, Fischer JP, Wes AM. et al. The cost of major complications associated with immediate two-stage expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2015; 49: 166-171 doi:10.3109/2000656X.2014.970639
• 17 Lagares-Borrego A, Gacto-Sanchez P, Infante-Cossio P. et al. A comparison of long-term cost and clinical outcomes between the two-stage sequence expander/prosthesis and autologous deep inferior epigastric flap methods for breast reconstruction in a public hospital. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69: 196-205 doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2015.11.027
• 18 Frederick MJ, Lin AM, Neuman R. et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with previous breast surgery: comparative analysis of 775 immediate breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 954e-962e doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001283
• 19 Komorowska-Timek E, Turfe Z, Davis AT. Outcomes of prosthetic reconstruction of irradiated and nonirradiated breasts with fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139: 1e-9e doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000002916
• 20 Thorarinsson A, Frojd V, Kolby L. et al. A retrospective review of the incidence of various complications in different delayed breast reconstruction methods. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2016; 50: 25-34 doi:10.3109/2000656X.2015.1066683
• 21 Munhoz AM, Aldrighi CM, Montag E. et al. Clinical outcomes following nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: a 12-year experience with an analysis of patient and breast-related factors for complications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 140: 545-555 doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2634-7
• 22 Manning AT, Wood C, Eaton A. et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and variants of uncertain significance. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 1354-1359 doi:10.1002/bjs.9884
• 23 Manning AT, Sacchini VS. Conservative mastectomies for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center experience. Gland Surg 2016; 5: 55-62 doi:10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2015.10.02
• 24 Satteson ES, Reynolds MF, Bond AM. et al. An analysis of complication risk factors in 641 nipple reconstructions. Breast J 2016; 22: 379-383 doi:10.1111/tbj.12591
• 25 Sisti A, Grimaldi L, Tassinari J. et al. Nipple-areola complex reconstruction techniques: a literature review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; 42: 441-465 doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.003
• 26 Momeni A, Ghaly M, Gupta D. et al. Nipple reconstruction: risk factors and complications after 189 procedures. Eur J Plast Surg 2013; 36: 633-638 doi:10.1007/s00238-013-0841-4
• 27 Silva-Vergara C, Fontdevila J, Descarrega J. et al. Oncological outcomes of lipofilling breast reconstruction: 195 consecutive cases and literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69: 475-481 doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2015.12.029
• 28 Bayti T, Panouilleres M, Tropet Y. et al. [Fat grafting in breast reconstruction. Retrospective study of satisfaction and quality of life about 68 patients]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2016; 61: 190-199 doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2015.09.004
• 29 Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, Clough KB. et al. The oncologic outcome and immediate surgical complications of lipofilling in breast cancer patients: a multicenter study–Milan-Paris-Lyon experience of 646 lipofilling procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 341-346 doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e713c
• 30 Perez-Panzano E, Guemes-Sanchez A, Gascon-Catalan A. Quality of life following symptomatic macromastia surgery: short- and long-term evaluation. Breast J 2016; 22: 397-406 doi:10.1111/tbj.12589
• 31 Hammond DC, OʼConnor EA, Knoll GM. The short-scar periareolar inferior pedicle reduction technique in severe mammary hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 34-40 doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000802
• 32 Robert G, Duhamel A, Alet JM. et al. [Complications of breast reduction about 715 breasts]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2014; 59: 97-102 doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2014.01.003
• 33 Chatterjee A, Pyfer B, Czerniecki B. et al. Early postoperative outcomes in lumpectomy versus simple mastectomy. J Surg Res 2015; 198: 143-148 doi:10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.054
• 34 Pyfer B, Chatterjee A, Chen L. et al. Early postoperative outcomes in breast conservation surgery versus simple mastectomy with implant reconstruction: a NSQIP analysis of 11,645 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 92-98 doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4770-2
• 35 Al-Hilli Z, Thomsen KM, Habermann EB. et al. Reoperation for complications after lumpectomy and mastectomy for breast cancer from the 2012 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22 (Suppl. 03) S459-S469 doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4741-7
• 36 Hau E, Browne L, Capp A. et al. The impact of breast cosmetic and functional outcomes on quality of life: long-term results from the St. George and Wollongong randomized breast boost trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 139: 115-123 doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2508-z
• 37 Ahmed A, Bhatnagar S, Rana SP. et al. Prevalence of phantom breast pain and sensation among postmastectomy patients suffering from breast cancer: a prospective study. Pain Pract 2014; 14: E17-E28 doi:10.1111/papr.12089
• 38 Khan A, Zhang J, Sollazzo V. et al. Sensory change of the reconstructed breast envelope after skin-sparing mastectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016; DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.018.
• 39 Rao R, Euhus D, Mayo HG. et al. Axillary node interventions in breast cancer: a systematic review. JAMA 2013; 310: 1385-1394 doi:10.1001/jama.2013.277804
• 40 Lucci A, McCall LM, Beitsch PD. et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3657-3663 doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.07.4062
• 41 Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE. et al. Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 491-500 doi:10.1245/ASO.2006.05.013
• 42 Bafford A, Gadd M, Gu X. et al. Diminishing morbidity with the increased use of sentinel node biopsy in breast carcinoma. Am J Surg 2010; 200: 374-377 doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.10.012
• 43 OʼBrien W, Hasselgren PO, Hummel RP. et al. Comparison of postoperative wound complications and early cancer recurrence between patients undergoing mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Am J Surg 1993; 166: 1-5
• 44 Kaviani A, Safavi A, Mohammadzadeh N. et al. Oncoplastic surgery in breast conservation: a prospective evaluation of the patients, techniques, and oncologic outcomes. Am J Surg 2014; 208: 727-734 doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.04.005
• 45 Klinger M, Giannasi S, Klinger F. et al. Periareolar approach in oncoplastic breast conservative surgery. Breast J 2016; 22: 431-436 doi:10.1111/tbj.12590
• 46 Lohsiriwat V, Rotmensz N, Botteri E. et al. Do clinicopathological features of the cancer patient relate with nipple areolar complex necrosis in nipple-sparing mastectomy?. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 990-996 doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2677-8
• 47 Orzalesi L, Casella D, Santi C. et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: surgical and oncological outcomes from a national multicentric registry with 913 patients (1006 cases) over a six year period. Breast 2016; 25: 75-81 doi:10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.010
• 48 Wagner JL, Fearmonti R, Hunt KK. et al. Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 1137-1144 doi:10.1245/s10434-011-2099-z
• 49 Donovan CA, Harit AP, Chung A. et al. Oncological and surgical outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy: do incisions matter?. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5323-z.
• 50 Matsen CB, Mehrara B, Eaton A. et al. Skin flap necrosis after mastectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 257-264 doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4709-7
• 51 Toyserkani NM, Jorgensen MG, Haugaard K. et al. Seroma indicates increased risk of lymphedema following breast cancer treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Breast 2017; 32: 102-104 doi:10.1016/j.breast.2017.01.009
• 52 Goldberg JI, Riedel ER, Morrow M. et al. Morbidity of sentinel node biopsy: relationship between number of excised lymph nodes and patient perceptions of lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 2866-2872 doi:10.1245/s10434-011-1688-1
• 53 Semprini G, Cattin F, Vaienti L. et al. Oncoplastic surgery and cancer relapses: cosmetic and oncological results in 489 patients. Breast 2013; 22: 946-951 doi:10.1016/j.breast.2013.05.008
• 54 Hennigs A, Biehl H, Rauch G. et al. Change of patient-reported aesthetic outcome over time and identification of factors characterizing poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy: long-term results of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 1744-1751 doi:10.1245/s10434-015-4943-z
• 55 Hennigs A, Fuchs V, Sinn HP. et al. Do patients after reexcision due to involved or close margins have the same risk of local recurrence as those after one-step breast-conserving surgery?. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23: 1831-1837 doi:10.1245/s10434-015-5067-1
• 56 Tang R, Coopey SB, Merrill AL. et al. Positive nipple margins in nipple-sparing mastectomies: rates, management, and oncologic safety. J Am Coll Surg 2016; 222: 1149-1155 doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.016
• 57 Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M. et al. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg 2009; 249: 461-468 doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819a044f
• 58 Poling JS, Tsangaris TN, Argani P. et al. Frozen section evaluation of breast carcinoma sentinel lymph nodes: a retrospective review of 1,940 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 148: 355-361 doi:10.1007/s10549-014-3161-x
• 59 Wong J, Yong WS, Thike AA. et al. False negative rate for intraoperative sentinel lymph node frozen section in patients with breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of patients in a single Asian institution. J Clin Pathol 2015; 68: 536-540 doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202799
• 60 Ogunleye AA, Leroux O, Morrison N. et al. Complications after reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of wise pattern/inferior pedicle and vertical scar/superomedial pedicle. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 79: 13-16 doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000001059
• 61 Manahan MA, Buretta KJ, Chang D. et al. An outcomes analysis of 2142 breast reduction procedures. Ann Plast Surg 2015; 74: 289-292 doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31829d2261
• 62 Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Chung CU. et al. Obesity and early complications following reduction mammaplasty: an analysis of 4545 patients from the 2005–2011 NSQIP datasets. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2014; 48: 334-339 doi:10.3109/2000656X.2014.886582
• 63 Gupta V, Yeslev M, Winocour J. et al. Aesthetic breast surgery and concomitant procedures: incidence and risk factors for major complications in 73,608 cases. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37: 515-527 doi:10.1093/asj/sjw238