Download PDF
Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2003; 5(5): 495-503
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-44785
Original Paper

Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Pollination, Flower Longevity, and Reproductive Biology of Gongora quinquenervis Ruíz and Pavón (Orchidaceae) in an Atlantic Forest Fragment of Pernambuco, Brazil

P. Martini 1 , C. Schlindwein 1 , A. Montenegro 2
  • 1Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Botânica, Pernambuco, Brazil
  • 2Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Departamento de Biologia, Área de Zoologia, Pernambuco, Brazil
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 November 2003 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The pollinators, flower longevity, and reproductive success of Gongora quinquenervis were studied in Refúgio Ecológico Charles Darwin, a preserved fragment of Atlantic Forest in Pernambuco. G. quinquenervis is epiphytic, and its flowers have osmophores, glands that produce aromatic volatiles, that are collected by males of Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Every flower of an inflorescence opened simultaneously, however, overlaps in floral phases between individuals were low. Pollinaria deposition on the stigma caused immediate wilting of the perianth, while pollinaria removal had no influence on flower longevity. The reproductive system experiments showed that the species is self-compatible. The characteristics of floral morphology and its highly specialized pollination mechanism are efficient in limiting autogamy and geitonogamy and favouring cross-pollination. Three species of Euglossa were found (E. cordata, E. perpulchra and an undescribed species) visiting the flowers of G. quinquenervis. All these efficiently removed the pollinaria of the flowers, which adhered to the posterior margin of the scutellum. Even though there was a high pollinaria removal rate by pollinators, the reproductive success in the field was extraordinarily low. We suggest that low fruit set, despite high pollinator frequency, is a result of a combination of the particular phonological characteristics of G. quinquenervis, such as short flower longevity and low overlap of flowering phases between individuals, leading to the reduced population of this orchid in the degraded Atlantic Forest. Conservation measures are necessary to guarantee the survival of G. quinquenervis in the northern part of the Atlantic Forest of Brazil.

Key words

Pollination - Euglossini - Gongora quinquenervis - reproductive success - floral longevity.

References

  • 1 Allen P. H.. Pollination in Coryanthes speciosa. .  American Orchid Society Bulletin. (1950);  19 528-536
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ackerman J. D.. Coping with the epiphytic existence: pollination strategies.  Selbyana. (1986);  9 52-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Ackerman J. D.. Geographic and seasonal variation in fragrance choices and preferences of male euglossine bees.  Biotropica. (1989 a);  21 (4) 340-347
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ackerman J. D.. Limitations to sexual reproduction in Encyclia krugii (Orchidaceae).  Systematica Botany. (1989 b);  14 101-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ackerman J. D., Montalvo A. M.. Short and long-term limitations to fruit production in a tropical orchid.  Ecology. (1990);  71 267-272
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Arditti J.. Fundamentals of Orchid Biology. New York; Wiley (1992): 691
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Arditti J., Hogan N. M., Chadwick A. V.. Post-pollination phenomena in orchid flowers. IV. Effects of Ethylene.  American Journal of Botany. (1973);  63 201-211
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ashman T. L., Schoen D. J.. How long should flowers live?.  Nature. (1994);  371 788-791
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Burg S. P., Dijkman M. J.. Ethylene and auxin participation in pollen induced fading of Vanda orchid blossoms.  Plant Physiology. (1967);  42 1648-1650
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Carvalho R., Machado I. C.. Pollination of Catasetum Macrocarpum (Orchidaceae) by Eulaema bombiformis (Euglossini).  Lindleyana. (2002);  17 (2) 85-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Case F.. Orchids of the Western Great Lakes Region. Bloomfield Hills; Cranbrook Institute of Science (1964): 147
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Chase M. W., Hills H.. Orchid phylogeny, flower sexuality, and fragrance-seeking. Evidence from variation in chloroplast DNA among subtribes Catasetinae and Cyrtopodiinae.  BioScience. (1992);  42 (1) 43-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Crüger H.. A few notes on the fecundation of orchids and their morphology.  Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society of London. (1865);  8 127-135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Devlin B., Stephenson A. G.. Factors that influence the staminate and pistillate phases of Lobelia cardinalis flowers.  Botanical Gazette. (1984);  145 323-328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Dodson C. H.. The importance of pollination in the evolution of the orchids of tropical America.  American Orchid Society Bulletin. (1962 a);  31 525-554 641-649 731-735
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Dodson C. H.. Pollination and variation in the subtribe catasetinae (Orchidaceae).  Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens. (1962 b);  49 35-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Dodson C. H.. Studies in orchid pollination, the genus Coryanthes. .  American Orchid Society Bulletin. (1965);  34 680-687
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dodson C. H.. Ethology of some bees of the tribe Euglossini (Hymenoptera: Apidae).  Kansas Entomological Society. (1966);  39 607-629
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dodson C. H.. Relationship between pollinators and orchid flowers.  Atas do Simpósio sobre a Biota Amazônica (Zoologia). (1967);  5 1-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dodson C. H., Frymire G. P.. Natural pollination of orchids.  Missouri Botanical Garden Bulletin. (1961);  49 133-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dressler R. L.. Some observations on Gongora. .  Orchid Digest. (1966);  30 220-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dressler R. L.. Why do some euglossine bees visit orchid flowers?.  Atas so Simpósio sobre a Biota Amazônica. (1967);  5 171-180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Dressler R. L.. Pollination by euglossine bees.  Evolution. (1968);  22 202-212
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dressler R. L.. The Orchids: Natural History and Classification. Massachusetts; Harvard University Press (1981): 332
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Dressler R. L.. Biology of the orchid bees (Euglossini).  Annual Review of Ecological Systematics. (1982);  13 373-394
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Dressler R. L.. Phylogeny and Classification of the Orchid Family. Oregon; Dioscorides Press (1993): 314
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Feinsinger P.. Coevolution and pollination. Futuyma, D. J. and Slatkin, M., eds. Coevolution. Sunderland; Sinauer Associates (1983): 282-310
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Felix L. P., Carvalho R.. Diversidade de orquídeas no Estado de Pernambuco. Tabarelli, M., and Silva, J. M. C., eds. Diagnóstico da Biodiversidade de Pernambuco, Vol. 1. Recife; Editora Massangana (2002): 207-218
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Galen C., Plowright R. C.. Testing the accuracy of using peroxidase activity to indicate stigma receptivity.  Canadian Journal of Botany. (1987);  65 107-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gerlach G., Schill R.. Composition of orchid scents attracting euglossine bees.  Botanica Acta. (1991);  104 379-391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Gori D. F.. Post-pollination phenomena and adaptative floral changes. Jones, C. E. and Little, R., eds. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. Toronto; Van Nostrand Reinhold (1983): 31-43
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Jenny R. A.. Monograph of the Genus Gongora Ruiz and Pavon. Champaign, Illinois; Koeltz Scientific Books (1993): 136
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Johnson S. D., Nilsson L. A.. Pollen carryover, geitonogamy, and the evolution of deceptive pollination systems in orchids.  Ecology. (1999);  80 (8) 2607-2619
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Johnson S. D., Edwards T. J.. The structure and function of orchid pollinaria.  Plant Systematics and Evolution. (2000);  222 243-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Martini P. C., Willadino L., Alves G. D., Donato V. M. T. S.. Propagação de orquídea Gongora quinquenervis por semeadura in vitro. .  Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. (2001);  36 (10) 1319-1324
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Millar A.. Orchids of Papua New Guinea. Seattle; University of Washington Press (1978): 101
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Miranda F. E. L. F.. Orquídeas da Amazônia Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro; Expressão e Cultura (1996): 191
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Nazarov V. V., Gerlach G.. The potential seed productivity of orchid flowers and peculiarities of their pollination systems.  Lindleyana. (1997);  12 (4) 188-204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Neiland M. R. M., Wilcock C. C.. Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae.  American Journal of Botany. (1998);  85 (12) 1657-1671
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Newstron L. E., Frankie G. W., Baker H. G.. A new classification for phenology based on flowering patterns in Lowland Tropical Rain Forest trees at La Selva, Costa Rica.  Biotropica. (1994);  26 141-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 O'Neill S. D.. Pollination regulation of flower development.  Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. (1997);  48 547-574
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Proctor H., Harder L. D.. Effect of pollination success on floral longevity in the orchid Calypso bulbosa. .  American Journal of Botany. (1995);  82 (9) 1131-1136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Radford A. E., Dickinson W. C., Massey J. R., Bell C. R.. Vascular Plant Systematics. New York; Harper and Row Publishers (1974): 269-284
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Rebêlo J. M. M.. História Natural das Euglossíneas. As Abelhas das Orquídeas. São Luís; Lithograf Editoria (2001): 152
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Ruschi A.. Orquídeas do Estrado do Espírito Santo. 2nd ed. 1997. Rio de Janeiro; Expressão e Cultura (1986): 278
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Stratton D. A.. Longevity of individual flowers in a Costa Rican cloud forest.  Biotropica. (1989);  21 308-318
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Van der Pijl L., Dodson C. H.. Orchid Flowers, their Pollination and Evolution. Miami; University of Miami Press (1966): 214
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Vogel S.. Duftdrüsen im Dienste der Bestäubung: Über Bau und Funktion der Osmophoren. Mainz; Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur (1962): 1-165
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Vogel S.. Das sexuelle Anlockungsprinzip der Catasetinen und Stanhopeen-Blüten und die wahre Funktion ihres sogenannten Futtergewebes.  Österr. Bot. Z.. (1963);  110 (213) 308-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Weiss M. R., Lamont B. B.. Floral color change and insect pollination: a dynamic relationship.  Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. (1997);  45 185-199
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Williams N. H., Whitten W. M.. Orchid floral fragrances and male euglossine bees: methods and advances in the last sesquidecade.  Biological Bulletin. (1983);  164 355-395
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Zimmerman J. K., Aide T. M.. Patterns of fruit production in a neotropical orchid: Pollinator vs. resource limitation.  American Journal of Botany. (1989);  76 67-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

P. Martini

Rua Jerônimo de Albuquerque, nº 86, Apt. 301-B

Casa Forte

Recife, PE 52061-470

Brazil

Email: pcmartini@hotmail.com

Section Editor: G. Gottsberger