Ring-Rearrangement Metathetic Approach to Fused 6/5/6/5/6-Oxacyclic Ring System and Bipentalene Derivatives

Abstract

We have developed a useful synthetic route to a 6/5/6/5/6-oxacyclic ring system and bipentalene derivatives from dimeric 7-oxonorbornene derivatives by using ring-rearrangement metathesis as a key step. This method provides access to fused oxacycles containing eight stereogenic centers in just three steps and to bipentalene derivatives in two steps only.

Key words

ring-rearrangement metathesis - oxacycles - pentalenes - norbornenes - Grubbs catalysts

Publication History

Received: 20 June 2022

Accepted after revision: 09 August 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
09 August 2022

Article published online:
11 October 2022

• References and Notes

• 1 Stonik VA. Acta Naturae 2009; 1: 15
• 2a Kadota I, Yamamoto Y. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005; 38: 423
• 2b Oguri H, Hirama M, Tsumuraya T, Fujii I, Maruyama M, Uehara H, Nagumo Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003; 125: 7608
• 2c Klayman DL. Science 1985; 228: 1049
• 3a Miyamoto T, Kodama K, Aramaki Y, Higuchi R, Van Soest RW. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001; 42: 6349
• 3b Zhou W, Lui B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43: 4187
• 4 Tian H.-Y, Wang L, Zhang X.-Q, Wang Y, Zhang D.-M, Jiang R.-W, Liu Z, Liu J.-S, Li Y.-L, Ye W.-C. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 10989
• 5a Liu YF, Yu S.-S. J. Asian Nat. Prod. Res. 2019; 21: 1129
• 5b Zhang W, Zhang G, Zhang L, Liu W, Jiang X, Jin H, Liu Z, Zhang H, Zhou A, Zhang C. Tetrahedron 2018; 74: 6839
• 6 Su J.-H, Lin F.-Y, Huang H.-C, Dai C.-F, Wu Y.-C, Hu W.-P, Hsu C.-H, Sheu J.-H. Tetrahedron 2007; 63: 703
• 7 Liu H.-X, Tan H.-B, Chen Y.-C, Li S.-N, Li H.-H, Zhang W.-N. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020; 17: 2430
• 8 Nohara T, Kashiwada Y, Nishioka I. Phytochemistry 1985; 24: 1849
• 9 Stellfeld T, Bhatt U, Kalesse M. Org. Lett. 2004; 6: 3889
• 10a Kotha S, Tangella Y. Synlett 2020; 31: 1976
• 10b Nolan SP, Claveir H. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010; 39: 3305
• 10c Kotha S, Lahiri K. Synlett 2007; 2767
• 10d Kotha S, Meshram M, Dommaraju Y. Chem. Rec. 2018; 18: 1613
• 10e Kotha S, Krishna NG, Halder S, Misra S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011; 9: 5597
• 11a Calderon N, Chen HY, Scott KW. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967; 3327
• 11b Calderon N. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972; 5: 127
• 11c Grubbs RH, Carr DD, Hoppin C, Burk PL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976; 98: 3478
• 11d Grubbs RH, Burk PL, Carr DD. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975; 97: 3265
• 11e Katz TJ, Rothchild R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976; 98: 2519
• 12 Handbook of Metathesis, 2nd ed. Grubbs R H, Wenzel AG. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2015
• 13a Kotha S, Keesari RR. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 17129
• 13b Kotha S, Sreenivasachary N, Mohanraja K, Durani S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001; 11: 1421
• 13c Kotha S, Waghule GT. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 6314
• 13d Kotha S, Meshram M, Khedkar P, Banerjee S, Deodhar D. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015; 11: 1833
• 13e Kotha S, Shirbhate ME, Waghule GT. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015; 11: 1274
• 13f Bose S, Ghosh M, Ghosh S. J. Org. Chem. 2012; 77: 6345
• 13g Holub N, Blechert S. Chem. Asian J. 2007; 2: 1064
• 14 Kotha S, Pulletikurti S, Fatma A, Dhangar G, Naidu GS. Synthesis 2021; 53: 1931
• 15a Garcia JG, Fronczek FR, McLaughlin ML. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991; 32: 3289
• 15b Garcia JG, McLaughlin ML. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991; 32: 3293
• 16 Khan FA, Parasuraman K. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010; 6: 64
• 17 Newcomer JS, McBee ET. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948; 71: 946
• 18a Lap BV, Paddon-Row MN. J. Org. Chem. 1979; 44: 4979
• 18b Berkowitz DB. Synthesis 1990; 649
• 19 Fürstner A, Langemann K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997; 119: 9130
• 20 Kotha, S.; Jena. K. unpublished results.
• 21 CCDC 2175968, 2176027, and 2175972, contain the supplementary crystallographic data for compounds 10, 16, and 18. The data can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/structures.
• 22 Bipentalene Derivatives; General ProcedureA magnetically stirred solution of the RRM precursor in anhyd CH₂Cl₂ was degassed by sequential purging with N₂ and ethylene gas for about 10 min each. The Grubbs catalyst was added in one portion at rt under C₂H₂ at 1 atm, and purging was continued for another 2–5 min. The mixture was stirred at the appropriate temperature under C₂H₂ until the reaction was complete (TLC). The crude product was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, EtOAc–PE).3,3′-Divinyl-2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,6a,6a′-octahydro-1,1′-bipentalene-3a,3a′(1H,1′H)-diol (12a)Colorless liquid; yield: 65%. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 5.93–5.86 (m, 2 H), 5.69–5.68 (m, 2 H), 5.63–5.61 (m, 2 H), 5.12–5.06 (m, 4 H), 2.91–2.90 (m, 2 H), 2.69–2.65 (m, 2 H), 2.60–2.55 (m, 2 H), 2.19–2.15 (m, 2 H), 1.95–1.91 (m, 2 H), 1.85–1.81 (m, 2 H), 1.86–1.71 (m, 2 H), 1.10–1.07 (m, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 137.7, 130.4, 129.3, 116.1, 90.0, 60.8, 55.2, 44.5, 43.0, 34.6. HRMS (ESI, Q-ToF): m/z [M + Na]⁺ calcd for C₂₀H₂₆NaO₂: 321.1825; found: 321.1823.3a,3a′-Dimethoxy-3,3′-divinyl-1,1′,2,2′,3,3′,3a,3a′,4,4′,6a,6a′-dodecahydro-1,1′-bipentalene (17)Yellow liquid; yield: 60%. ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 5.94–5.48 (m, 6 H), 5.15–5.03 (m, 4 H), 3.25 (s, 3 H), 3.20 (s, 3 H), 3.11–3.06 (m, 2 H), 2.84–2.68 (m, 2 H), 2.49–2.31 (m, 4 H), 2.19–1.88 (m, 4 H), 1.17–1.06 (m, 2 H). ¹³C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl₃): δ = 138.5, 135.6, 133.8, 130.8, 130.3, 127.4, 117.3, 115.5, 97.9, 95.4, 54.7, 54.6, 53.9, 51.3, 51.2, 50.9, 44.6, 42.7, 38.9, 36.8, 34.5, 34.3. HRMS (ESI, Q-ToF): m/z [M + H]⁺ calcd for C₂₂H₃₁O₂: 327.4800; found: 327.4805.