Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml
Synlett 2024; 35(04): 455-458
DOI: 10.1055/a-2236-1197
DOI: 10.1055/a-2236-1197
cluster
11th Singapore International Chemistry Conference (SICC-11)
Magnesiation of Alkyl Fluorides Catalyzed by Rhodium–Aluminum Bimetallic Complexes
This work was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI [Grants Numbers JP20H00376 (Y.N.), JP22K19026 (K.S.), and JP21J14457 (I.F.)], Toray Science Foundation (Y.N.), The Mitsubishi Foundation (K.S.), Grant for Basic Science Research Projects from The Sumitomo Foundation (K.S.), and Mizuho Foundation for the Promotion of Sciences (K.S.).
Abstract
Since the pioneering work by Grignard in 1900, organomagnesium reagents, the so-called Grignard reagents, have been indispensable in organic synthesis. Alkyl Grignard reagents are usually prepared from the corresponding alkyl iodides, bromides, or chlorides with Mg, whereas alkyl fluorides are not viable substrates under conventional conditions due to the high stability of the C–F bonds. We report that Al–Rh bimetallic complexes catalyze the magnesiation of C(sp3)–F bonds of alkyl fluorides using easy-to-handle Mg powder. The present conditions can accommodate primary, secondary, or tertiary alkyl fluorides to afford the corresponding alkylmagnesium reagents, which can be successfully converted into various functionalities.
Key words
alkyl fluorides - organomagnesium compounds - Grignard reagents - aluminum catalysis - rhodium catalysis - C–F bond activationSupporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2236-1197.
- Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 05 August 2023
Accepted after revision: 28 December 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
28 December 2023
Article published online:
29 January 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1 Present address: I. Fujii, Division of Chemistry, Department of Materials Engineering Science, Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan.
- 2a Grignard V. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1900; 130: 1322
- 2b Seyferth D. Organometallics 2009; 28: 1598
- 3a Krasovskiy A, Knochel P. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004; 43: 3333
- 3b Bao RL.-Y, Zhao R, Shi L. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 6884
- 3c Ziegler DS, Wei B, Knochel P. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 2695
- 4a Pietrasiak E, Lee E. Chem. Commun. 2022; 58: 2799
- 4b Blanksby SJ, Ellison GB. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003; 36: 255
- 4c O’Hagan D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008; 37: 308
- 5a Pattison FL. M, Howell WC. J. Org. Chem. 1956; 21: 879
- 5b Ashby EC, Yu SH, Beach RG. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970; 92: 433
- 5c Bernstein J, Roth JS, Miller WT. Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948; 70: 2310
- 5d Ashby EC, Yu SH. J. Org. Chem. 1971; 36: 2123
- 6a Rieke RD, Bales SE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974; 96: 1775
- 6b Rieke RD, Hudnall PM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972; 94: 7178
- 6c Klabunde KJ, Whetten A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986; 108: 6529
- 6d Bare WD, Andrews L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998; 120: 7293
- 7a Coates G, Ward BJ, Bakewell C, White AJ. P, Crimmin MR. Chem. Eur. J. 2018; 24: 16282
- 7b Sheldon DJ, Parr JM, Crimmin MR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023; 145: 10486
- 7c Bonyhady SJ, Jones C, Nembenna S, Stasch A, Edwards AJ, McIntyre GJ. Chem. Eur. J. 2010; 16: 938
- 8 Fujii I, Semba K, Li Q.-Z, Sakaki S, Nakao Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020; 142: 11647
- 9 Ashby EC, Yu S. J. Organomet. Chem. 1971; 29: 339
- 10a Basha A, Lipton M, Weinreb SM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977; 18: 4171
- 10b Nahm S, Weinreb SM. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981; 22: 3815
- 11a Lu X. Top. Catal. 2005; 35: 73
- 11b Hayashi T, Konishi M, Kobori Y, Kumada M, Higuchi T, Hirotsu K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984; 106: 158
- 12 Pitsch CE, Wang X. Chem. Commun. 2017; 53: 8196
- 13a Bogdanović B, Leitner W, Six C, Wilczok U, Wittmann K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1997; 36: 502
- 13b Seki R, Takaya H, Nakao Y. ChemRxiv 2023; DOI: preprint
- 14a Crabtree RH. Chem. Rev. 2012; 112: 1536
- 14b Reay AJ, Fairlamb IJ. S. Chem. Commun. 2015; 51: 16289
- 15 2-Methyl-4-phenylbutanoic Acid (3b); Typical Procedure In a glove box, a 4 mL vial equipped with a stirrer bar was charged with Mg powder (61 mg, 2.5 mmol, 5.0 equiv) and (3-fluorobutyl)benzene (2b; 76 mg, 0.50 mmol, 1.0 equiv). A suspension of catalyst 1a (20 mg, 13 μmol, 5.0 mol% of Rh) in THF (1.5 mL) was added to the vial, which was then capped with a PTFE sealing screw cap and removed from the glovebox. The mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 48 h, and the resulting mixture was then stirred under CO2 at atmospheric pressure and r.t. for 2 h. 3 M aq HCl (1.5 mL) was added, and the resulting mixture was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 2.0 mL). All volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the residue was purified by MPLC [silica gel, hexane–EtOAc (70:30) + AcOH (10 vol%)] to give a colorless oil; yield: 65 mg (73%); Rf = 0.44 (hexane–EtOAc, 70:30 + 10% HOAc). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.33–7.27 (m, 2 H), 7.23–7.14 (m, 3 H), 2.68 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 2.52 (sext, J = 6.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.14–1.99 (m, 1 H), 1.76 (ddt, J = 13.9, 8.4, 6.8 Hz, 1 H), 1.24 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H). 13C{1H} NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 183.0, 141.6, 128.6, 128.5, 126.1, 38.9, 35.3, 33.5, 17.1.