Tödliche Ambivalenz

• Literatur

• 1 Bleuler E. Die schizophrenen Geistesstörungen im Lichte langjähriger Krankenund Familiengeschichten. Stuttgart: Thieme 1908
• 2 Bleuler E. Dementia Praecox oder die Gruppe der Schizophrenien. Leipzig, Wien: Franz Deuticke 1911
• 3 De Vogli R, Chandola T, Marmot MG. Negative aspects of close relationships and heart disease. Archives of Internal Medicine 2007; 167: 1951-7.
• 4 Eaker ED. et al. Marital status, marital strain, and risk of coronary heart disease or total mortality: the Framingham Offspring Study. Psychosom Med 2007; 69: 509-513.
• 5 Eisenberger N. et al. Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses. Neuroimage 2007; 35: 1601-12.
• 6 Headey B, Muffels R, Wagner GG. Long-running German panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes, matter for happiness. PNAS 2011; 107: 17922-6.
• 7 Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton B. Social relationships and mortality: A meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 2010; 07 (07) e1000316.
• 8 Holt-Lunstad J. et al. On the importance of relationship quality: The impact of ambivalence in friendships on cardiovascular functioning. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2007; 33: 278-90.
• 9 House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science 1988; 241: 540-5.
• 10 Koskenvuo M. et al. Social factors and the gender difference in mortality. Soc Sci Med 1986; 23: 605-9.
• 11 Mc FRCausland, Sacks FM, Forman JP. Marital status, dipping and nocturnal blood pressure: results from the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension trial. Journal of Hypertension. 2014 32. DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000000107.
• 12 Newsom JT. et al. The relative importance of three domains of positive and negative social exchanges: A longitudinal model with comparable measures. Psychology and Aging 2003; 18: 746-54.
• 13 Pietromonaco PR, Uchino BN, Dunkel-Schetter C. Close relationship processes and health: Implications of attachment theory for health and disease. Health Psychology 2013; 32: 499-513.
• 14 Pletcher MJ. et al. Using the coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary heart disease events: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Archives of Internal Medicine 2004; 64: 1285-92.
• 15 Reblin M, Uchino BN, Smith TW. Provider and recipient factors that may moderate the effectiveness of received support: Examining the effects of relationship quality and expectations for support on behavioral and cardiovascular reactions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2010; 33: 423-31.
• 16 Robles TF. et al. Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 2014; 140: 140-87.
• 17 Sapolsky R. Stress in the wild. Scientific American 1990; 262 (01) 106-113.
• 18 Sapolsky R. Stress, the aging brain, and the mechanisms of neuron death. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1992
• 19 Smith TW. et al. Hostile personality traits and coronary artery calcification in middle-aged and older married couples: Different effects for self-reports versus spouse ratings. Psychosomatic Medicine 2007; 69: 441-8.
• 20 Smith TW. et al. Affiliation and control during marital disagreement, history of divorce and asymptomatic coronary artery calcification in older couples. Psychosomatic Medicine 2011; 73: 350-7.
• 21 Spitzer M. Bloß keinen Stress!. Nervenheilkunde 2013; 32: 525-31.
• 22 Spitzer M. Idealisieren der Realität statt Realisieren von Idealen. Das Unbewusste zur Hochzeit und die Qualität der Ehe. Nervenheilkunde 2013; 32: 962-5.
• 23 Thorsteinsson EB, James JE. A meta-analysis of the effects of experimental manipulations of social support during laboratory stress. Psychology and Health 1999; 14: 869-86.
• 24 Uchino BN. et al. Social relationships and health: Is feeling positive, negative, or both (ambivalent) about your social ties related to telomeres. Health Psychology 2012; 31: 789-96.
• 25 Uchino BN. et al. Spousal relationship quality and cardiovascular risk: Dyadic perceptions of relationship ambivalence are associated with coronary-artery calcification. Psychological Science. 2014 DOI: 10.1177/09567976135200151-6.