Perspektiven der Endoskopie: Bericht von der UEGW 2010

Zusammenfassung

Die 18. United European Gastroenterology Week (UEGW) fand im Oktober 2010 in Barcelona statt. Sie war von einer Rückkehr zur traditionellen allei­nigen UEGW charakterisiert, nach dem im vorigen Jahr ein kombiniertes Kongressformat Gastro 2009 gewählt worden war. Es wurden verschiedene Abstracts zu endoskopischen Themen präsentiert. Für an der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie Interessierte ergab sich eine einzigartige Gelegenheit, nicht nur die neuesten Fortschritte präsentiert zu bekommen, sondern sich auch mit Kollegen aus der ganzen Welt zu treffen und Erfahrungen auszutauschen. Dieser Bericht konzentriert sich vor allem auf die oralen Präsentationen mit wenigen ausgewählten Posterpräsentationen, sie werden im Kontext mit der aktuellen Literatur in den entsprechenden Feldern der gastrointestinalen Endoskopie kurz abgehandelt. 

Abstract

The 18^th United European Gastroenterology Week (UEGW), held in Barcelona in October 2010, ­marked a return to the traditional “stand-alone” UEGW meeting after the previous year’s com­bined congress format of GASTRO 2009. Various abstracts on endoscopic subjects were presented, providing a unique opportunity for those inter­ested in gastrointestinal endoscopy to not only become acquainted with the latest advancements and research in the field, but also to meet and exchange experiences with colleagues from all over the world. This report will focus mainly on oral presentations, with a few selected poster presentations, which will be reviewed briefly in the context of recent literature in the respective fields of gastrointestinal endoscopy. 

Schlüsselwörter

Barrett-Ösophagus - gastrointestinale Blutung - Enteroskopie - Koloskopie - ERCP - EUS

Key words

Barrett’s esophagus - gastrointestinal bleeding - colonoscopy - enteroscopy - ERCP - EUS

Literatur

• 1 Inoue H, Minami H, Kaga M et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal dysplasia and carcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;  20 25-34, v-vi
• 2 Saito Y, Takisawa H, Suzuki H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of recurrent or residual superficial esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 355-359
• 3 Cho W Y, Kim Y J, Cho J Y et al. Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: endoscopic full-thickness resection of early gastric cancer and laparoscopic regional lymph node dissection – 14 human cases.  Endoscopy. 2011;  43 134-139
• 4 Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S et al. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with special reference to validation for curability criteria.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 118-122
• 5 Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.  Surg Endosc. 2010;  24 343-352
• 6 Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 723-729
• 7 Ribeiro-Mourão F, Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions: results of an European inquiry.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 814-819
• 8 Moss A, Bourke M J, Tran K et al. Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40-mm colonic lesions.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 400-404
• 9 Deprez P H, Bergman J J, Meisner S et al. Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: position statement from a panel of experts.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 853-858
• 10 Neuhaus H. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West – too many concerns and caveats?.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 859-861
• 11 Marc G, Lopes C V. Endoscopic resection of superficial gastrointestinal tumors.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 4600-4606
• 12 Larghi A, Waxman I. State of the art on endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2007;  17 441-469, v
• 13 Probst A, Arnholdt H, Anthuber M, Messmann H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the esophagus – First experience in a European center.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A38
• 14 Probst A, Pommer B, Arnholdt H et al. Endoscopic submucosal dis­section (ESD) in gastric lesions – 108 cases from a European center.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A39
• 15 Kato M, Nishida T, Tsutsui S et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group.  J Gastroenterol. DOI: DOI: 10.1007/s00535-010-0350-1
• 16 Michida T, Maeda K, Iwahashi K et al. Treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) – Long-term outcomes of a prospective study for the expanded indication.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A83
• 17 Lee Y, Cho J, Cho Y et al. Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic sub­muco­sal dissection in very elderly patients.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A76
• 18 Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Hoteya S et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 113-117
• 19 Morita S, Muto M, Mashimo Y et al. Endoscopic subepithelial dissection for superficial pharyngeal cancer: a case series of 56 superficial cancers.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A75
• 20 Kim D H, Jung H O, Choi K D et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic ­resection for premalignant and early malignant lesions of the esoph­agus: comparison between EMR and ESD method.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A75
• 21 Spechler S J, Davila R. Endoscopic therapy in Barrett’s esophagus: when and how?.  Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2009;  18 509-521
• 22 Ahmadi A, Draganov P. Endoscopic mucosal resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 1984-1989
• 23 Pouw R E, Gondrie J J, van Vilsteren F G et al. A randomised prospective trial comparing the cap-technique and multi-band mucosectomy technique for piecemeal endoscopic resection in Barrett esophagus.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl. I)I A83
• 24 Pouw R E, Alvarez Herrero L, van Vilsteren F GI et al. A randomized prospective trial in 74 patients comparing the ER-cap technique and ­multi-band mucosectomy technique for piecemeal endoscopic resection in Barrett esophagus.  Gut. 2009;  58 (Suppl. I)I A47
• 25 Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw R E, van Vilsteren F G et al. Multi-band mu­cosectomy in Barrett's oesophagus: a prospective registration of 1060 resections in 243 procedures.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A95
• 26 Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw R E, van Vilsteren F G et al. Risk of lymph node metastasis associated with deeper invasion by early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: study based on endoscopic resection specimens.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 1030-1036
• 27 Ishihara R, Kanzaki H, Uedo N et al. Long-term outcome of oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas initially treated by endoscopic resection.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A75
• 28 Kakushima N, Fujishiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neoplasms.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 2962-2967
• 29 Hoteya S, Iizuka T, Kikuchi D et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric submucosal tumor, endoscopic sub-tumoral dissection.  Dig Endosc. 2009;  21 266-269
• 30 Liu B, Song J, Qu B et al. Endoscopic muscularis dissection for esophageal submucosal tumors originated from muscularis propria.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A68
• 31 Chung I-K, Kim S-J, Lee S-H et al. What is the optimal duration of proton pump inhibitor and deciding factors for complete healing of artificial ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection?.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A75
• 32 Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okada K et al. Development of an esophageal regenerative therapy with a bioabsorbable polymer sheet.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A76
• 33 Voermans R P, Deprez P, Le Moine O et al. Endoscopic closure of iatrogenic perforations of the gastrointestinal tract using the over-the-scope-clip: a prospective multicenter human trial.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A64
• 34 Renteln D von, Vassiliou M C, Rothstein R I. Randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic clips and over-the-scope clips for closure of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomies.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 1056-1061
• 35 Voermans R P, van Berge Henegouwen M I, Bemelman W A, Fockens P. ­Hybrid NOTES transgastric cholecystectomy with reliable gastric closure: an animal survival study.  Surg Endosc. DOI: DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1242-4
• 36 Pasricha P J, Hawari R, Ahmed I et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 761-764
• 37 Sumiyama K, Gostout C J, Rajan E et al. Pilot study of transesophageal endoscopic epicardial coagulation by submucosal endoscopy with the mucosal flap safety valve technique (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 497-501
• 38 Minami H, Inoue H, Kudo S. Clinical experiences of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.  Gut. 2009;  58 (Suppl. I)I A8
• 39 Minami H, Inoue H, Hosoya T et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: POEM – 35 cases clinical experiences – noble endoscopic treatment against esophageal achalasia.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A2
• 40 Curvers W L, Herrero L A, Wallace M B et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging is more effective than standard endoscopy in identifying early-stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2010;  139 1106-1114
• 41 Ignjatovic A, East J E, Suzuki N et al. Are we ready for optical diagnosis? DISCARD study: early results.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 Suppl 1 A226
• 42 Muto M, Horimatsu T, Ezoe Y et al. Improving visualization techniques by narrow band imaging and magnification endoscopy.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  24 1333-1346
• 43 Song L M, Adler D G, Conway J D. ASGE Technology Committee, . Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 581-589
• 44 Mannath J, Subramanian V, Hawkey C J et al. Narrow band imaging for characterization of high grade dysplasia and specialized intestinal meta­plasia in Barrett's esophagus: a meta-analysis.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 351-359
• 45 Tischendorf J J, Gross S, Winograd R et al. Computer-aided classification of colorectal polyps based on vascular patterns: a pilot study.  Endos­copy. 2010;  42 203-207
• 46 Uchiyama Y, Imazu H, Kakutani H et al. New approach to diagnosing ampullary tumors by magnifying endoscopy combined with a narrow-band imaging system.  J Gastroenterol. 2006;  41 483-490
• 47 Itoi T, Neuhaus H, Chen Y K. Diagnostic value of image-enhanced video cholangiopancreatoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2009;  19 557-566
• 48 Norimura D, Isomoto H, Akazawa Y et al. Magnifying endoscopic observation with narrow band imaging for specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus – importance of light blue crests.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A98
• 49 Norimura D, Isomoto H, Nakayama T et al. Magnifying endoscopic observation with narrow band imaging for specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus with special reference to light blue crests.  Dig Endosc. 2010;  22 101-106
• 50 Takaki Y, Yao K, Ono Y et al. Usefulness and limitations of magnifying endoscopy (ME) with narrow-band imaging (NBI) for predicting depth of invasion of superficial esophageal carcinoma.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A98
• 51 Nagahama T, Yao K, Maki S et al. Advantage of magnifying endoscopy (ME) with narrow-band imaging (NBI) over standard endoscopy for determining the margins of lateral extent of early gastric cancer.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A99
• 52 Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Soares J et al. Reproducibility and validity of high resolution-NBI (HR-NBI) endoscopy for diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia and gastric dysplasia.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A98
• 53 Coriat R, Chryssostalis A, Zeitoun J D et al. Computed virtual chromo­endoscopy system (FICE): a new tool for upper endoscopy?.  Gastro­enterol Clin Biol. 2008;  32 363-369
• 54 Parra-Blanco A, Jiménez A, Rembacken B et al. Validation of Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy with high definition endoscopes in colonoscopy.  World J Gastroenterol. 2009;  15 5266-5273
• 55 Neumann H, Fry L C, Bellutti M et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy-as­sisted virtual chromoendoscopy for small-bowel disorders: a case series.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 468-471
• 56 Hiraga Y, Sumioka M, Akagi M et al. Comparison between avascular-area of NBI magnification and type V pit pattern for invasion depth ­diagnosis of colorectal tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  71 AB210
• 57 Hiraga Y, Sumioka M, Akagi M et al. Comparison between narrow band imaging (NBI) magnification and flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) magnification for invasion depth diagnosis of colorectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A72
• 58 Teixeira C R, Oliveira L A, Saito Y et al. Worldwide multicenter inter­observer validation of a novel endoscopic classification of the capillary vessel pattern of colorectal lesions.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A72
• 59 East J E, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;  28 768-776
• 60 Curvers W L, Kiesslich R, Bergman J J. Novel imaging modalities in the detection of oesophageal neoplasia.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;  22 687-720
• 61 Kimura T, Yamano H-O, Yamamoto E et al. Identification of precursor lesions of colorectal cancers with CPG island methylator phenotype by molecular magnifying colonoscopy.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A58
• 62 Jass J R. Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features.  Histopathology. 2007;  50 113-130
• 63 Miwa S, Mitomi H, Igarashi M et al. Clinicopathologic differences among subtypes of serrated adenomas of the colorectum.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;  52 437-440
• 64 Wallace M B, Sharma P, Lightdale C et al. Preliminary accuracy and interobserver agreement for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  72 19-24
• 65 Pohl H, Koch M, Khalifa A et al. Evaluation of endocytoscopy in the surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 492-496
• 66 Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Neurath M F. Virtual histology.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;  22 883-897
• 67 Inoue H, Sasajima K, Kaga M et al. Endoscopic in vivo evaluation of tissue atypia in the esophagus using a newly designed integrated endocytoscope: a pilot trial.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 891-895
• 68 Kumagai Y, Kawada K, Yamazaki S et al. Prospective replacement of magnifying endoscopy by a newly developed endocytoscope, the ‘GIF-Y0002’.  Dis Esophagus. 2010;  23 627-632
• 69 Papanikolaou I S, Rösch T. GASTRO 2009 report: putting endoscopy into perspective.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 581-594
• 70 Kudo T, Inoue H, Minami H et al. In vivo endocytoscopic evaluation of gastric cancer; can optical biopsy replace pathology?.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A98
• 71 Mori Y, Kudo S-E, Ikehara N et al. Accuracy and reliability of predict­ing massively invasive submucosal colorectal cancers with endo­cytoscopy – A prospective comparative study.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A73
• 72 Rispo A, Maione F, Castiglione F et al. Diagnostic accuracy of confocal fluorescence microscopy in detecting dysplasia in patients affected by long-standing ulcerative colitis.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A58
• 73 Hlavaty T, Huorka M, Koller T et al. Colorectal cancer screening in ­patients with ulcerative and Crohn's colitis with use of colonos­copy, chromoendoscopy and confocal endomicroscopy.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A58
• 74 Eisendrath P, Devière J. “Red flag” techniques in Barrett's esophagus: minor additional benefit or a waste of time?.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 929-931
• 75 Curvers W L, Singh R, Wallace M B et al. Identification of predictive factors for early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus after autofluorescence imaging: a stepwise multicenter structured assessment.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  70 9-17
• 76 Matsuda T, Saito Y, Fu K I et al. Does autofluorescence imaging video ­endoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate? A pilot study.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;  103 1926-1932
• 77 Asaoka D, Nagahara A, Oguro M et al. Utility of autofluorescence imaging video endoscopy in screening for Barrett's esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 Suppl 2 E113
• 78 Curvers W L, Singh R, Song L M et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system.  Gut. 2008;  57 167-172
• 79 Aihara H, Saito S, Tajiri H. Differential diagnosis of colorectal neoplastic lesion from non-neoplastic lesions with color-tone grading in autofluorescence endoscopy.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A71
• 80 Lim L G, Bajbouj M, Delius S von et al. Fluorescein-enhanced auto­fluorescence imaging can accurately differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions: a feasibility study.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A72
• 81 Takeuchi Y, Inoue T, Hanaoka N et al. Combination of autofluorescence imaging and a transparent hood for detection of colorectal neoplasms: a prospective randomized trial.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A72
• 82 Takeuchi Y, Inoue T, Hanaoka N et al. Autofluorescence imaging with a transparent hood for detection of colorectal neoplasms: a prospective, randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  72 1006-1013
• 83 Longcroft-Wheaton G, Mead R, Bhandari P. A large prospective cohort study demonstrating the cost effectiveness of acetic acid chromo­endoscopy in the evaluation of Barrett's neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A97
• 84 Lundell L R. Etiology and risk factors for esophageal carcinoma.  Dig Dis. 2010;  28 641-644
• 85 Cooper S C, Graham P J, Trudgill N. Risk factors for the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a United Kingdom primary care nested case-control study.  Gut. 2008;  57 A1-A172
• 86 Menon S, Trudgill N. COPD and the risk of Barrett's oesophagus and ­oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a matched cohort study.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A4
• 87 Heuberger D, Manner H, Ell C et al. How is early Barrett's cancer currently diagnosed and treated throughout Western Europe? Results of a survey at 107 University Hospitals in 8 Western European countries.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A258
• 88 Roorda A K, Marcus S N, Triadafilopoulos G. Early experience with radiofrequency energy ablation therapy for Barrett's esophagus with and without dysplasia.  Dis Esophagus. 2007;  20 516-522
• 89 Fleischer D E, Overholt B F, Sharma V K et al. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus: 5-year outcomes from a prospective multicenter trial.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 781-789
• 90 Shaheen N J, Sharma P, Overholt B F et al. Radiofrequency ablation in ­Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia.  N Engl J Med. 2009;  360 2277-2288
• 91 Shaheen N J, Peery A F, Hawes R H et al. Quality of life following radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 790-799
• 92 Pouw R E, Bisschops R, Pech O et al. Safety outcomes of balloon-based circumferential radiofrequency ablation after focal endoscopic resection of early Barrett's neoplasia in 118 patients: results of an ongoing European multicenter study.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A94
• 93 Garcia Iglesias P, Villòria A, Suarez Lamas D et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis: predictors of recurrent hemorrhage after endoscopic hemostatic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A2
• 94 Lim L G, Ho K Y, Lim L L et al. Glasgow Blatchford score as a triage tool for emergency endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed.  Gut. 2009;  58 (Suppl. II) A92
• 95 Lim L G, Ho K Y, Chan Y H et al. Urgent endoscopy is associated with lower mortality in high-risk but not low-risk non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A42
• 96 Sung J J-Y, Luo D, Wu J C et al. Safety and efficacy of nanopowder TC325 (hemostatic spray) in the treatment of active ulcer bleeding.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A44
• 97 Lima J C, Monici L T, Gomes V P et al. Argon plasma coagulation in distal esophagus prevents recurrence of oesophageal varices after eradication using band ligation.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A30
• 98 Bonilha D Q, Correia L P, Gomes G F et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation (RVL) alone versus endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol in variceal bleeding prophylaxis in cirrhotic patients.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A55
• 99 Di Pascoli L, Gregori D, Buja A et al. Pharmacoeconomical analysis of primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding with beta-blockers vs. endoscopic surveillance in cirrhotic patients with small esophageal varices.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A55
• 100 Eliakim R. Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel.  Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2010;  26 129-133
• 101 Kaffes A J. Achieving total enteroscopy with capsule endoscopy in all patients: are we stretching the limits of technology?.  Gastrointest ­Endosc. 2009;  69 81-83
• 102 Li X, Chen H, Dai J et al. Predictive role of capsule endoscopy on the insertion route of double-balloon enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 762-766
• 103 Arakawa D, Ohmiya N, Nakamura M et al. Outcome after enteroscopy for patients with obscure GI bleeding: diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and video capsule endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 866-874
• 104 May A. How to approach the small bowel with flexible enteroscopy.  Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2010;  39 797-806
• 105 May A, Färber M, Aschmoneit I et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with the single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;  105 575-581
• 106 Frieling T, Heise J, Sassenrath W et al. Prospective comparison between double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy.  Endos­copy. 2010;  42 885-888
• 107 Dulic-Lakovic E, Dulic M, Hubner D et al. Bleeding from Dieulafoy ­lesions of the small bowel: a systematic study on epidemiology and efficacy of enteroscopic treatment.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A30
• 108 Akerman P A, Demarco D, Pangtay J. A pilot study of spiral enteroscopy using a new design self propelled motorized enteroscope with an integrated spiral.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A64
• 109 Akerman P A, Demarco D, Pangtay J. A self propelled spiral enteroscope with an integrated remote control spiral in a case of obscure Crohn's disease.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A66
• 110 Swain P, Toor A, Volke F et al. Remote magnetic manipulation of a wireless capsule endoscope in the esophagus and stomach of humans (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  71 1290-1293
• 111 Valdastri P, Quaglia C, Buselli E et al. A magnetic internal mechanism for precise orientation of the camera in wireless endoluminal applications.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 481-486
• 112 Rey J F, Ogata H, Hosoe N et al. Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 541-545
• 113 Rey J F, Ogata H, Hosoe N et al. First clinical trial on gastric examination with a guided capsule endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A26
• 114 Keller J, Fibbe C, Volke F et al. Inspection of the human stomach using remote-controlled capsule endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A27
• 115 Aihara H, Ikeda K, Tajiri H. Capsule endoscopy based on the mucosal vascularity diagnosis by using capsule equipped with selected white-light LED.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A43
• 116 Lecleire S, Duclos A, Iwanicki-Caron I et al. Emergency capsule endoscopy in severe acute obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnostic yield and impact on further clinical management.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A43
• 117 Jensen M D, Nathan T, Rafaelsen S R et al. Better diagnostic accuracy with capsule endoscopy compared to MRI- and CT-enterography in patients with suspected or newly diagnosed Crohn's disease.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A27
• 118 Triantafyllou K, Viazis N, Tsibouris P et al. Colon capsule endoscopy complements incomplete colonoscopy in clinical practice.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A27
• 119 Triantafyllou K, Tsibouris P, Kalantzis C et al. PillCam Colon capsule endos­copy does not always complement incomplete colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 572-576
• 120 Thiis-Evensen E, Bretthauer M, Kalager M et al. First randomized trial of colonoscopy screening for the prevention of colorectal cancer.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A34
• 121 Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Aminalai A et al. Prospective quality assess­ment of screening-colonoscopy in Berlin (Berlin Colonoscopy Project, ­BECOP-3).  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl. I) A197
• 122 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou I S et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?.  Gut. 2008;  57 59-64
• 123 Triantafyllou K, Kalli T, Misailidis N et al. Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program (CQI) on colonoscopy performance in an academic endoscopy facility.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A377
• 124 Lieberman D. Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.  Gastroenterology. 2010;  138 2115-2126
• 125 Pullens H, Oijen M V, Laheij R et al. No change in colorectal cancer stage 4 years after revision of the surveillance guidelines after polypectomy in the Netherlands.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A85
• 126 Suchanek S, Zavoral M, Majek O et al. National colorectal cancer screening programme in the Czech Republic.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A84
• 127 Denters M, Deutekom M, Bossuyt P et al. Cancers detected in par­ticipants of an FOBT based screening pilot are less advanced than cancers detected in nonparticipants of the same cohort.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A84
• 128 Saito Y, Hyodo I, Suzuki H et al. A comparison study of colorectal cancer positive predictive value and Dukes classification between the first day positive and negative group of 2 days FIT colorectal cancer screening.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A84
• 129 Terhaar Sive Droste J S, van Turenhout S, Oort F A et al. Can elective colonoscopy be postponed after a negative faecal immunochemical test in asymptomatic high risk patients?.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A85
• 130 Tobal F, Tobal D. Endoscopy in the elderly. Findings justify risks?.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A96
• 131 Hoffmeister M, Schmitz S, Karmrodt E et al. Male sex and smoking have a larger impact on the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia than family history of colorectal cancer.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;  8 870-876
• 132 Ferlitsch M, Reinhart K, Gal O et al. Time for a gender specific age for referring patients to screening colonoscopy?.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A96
• 133 Cha J M, Lee J I, Joo K R et al. Safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient colonoscopic polypectomy.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A21
• 134 Longcroft-Wheaton G, Mead R, Duku M et al. Colonic endoscopic ­mucosal resection: results from a large prospective series in a western setting.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A39
• 135 Longcroft-Wheaton G, Mead R, Uraoka T et al. Validation of a novel polyp classification system and comparison of outcomes between a Japanese and Western expert: a prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A97
• 136 Hahn S J, Kim J H, Ryu Y S et al. Efficacy of hemoclips on prevention from delayed bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection of colo­rectal polyps.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A40
• 137 Uraoka T, Saito Y, Yamaguchi Y et al. Large-scale multicenter analysis of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection-related complications.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A40
• 138 Meining A, Frimberger E, Becker V et al. Detection of cholangiocarci­noma in vivo using miniprobe-based confocal fluorescence micros­copy.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  6 1057-1060
• 139 Meining A. Confocal endomicroscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2009;  19 629-635
• 140 Loeser C S, Robert M E, Mennone A et al. Confocal endomicroscopic ­examination of malignant biliary strictures and histologic cor­relation with lymphatics.  J Clin Gastroenterol. DOI: DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181fbdc38
• 141 Costamagna G, Cesaro P, Tringali A et al. In-vivo miniprobe-based confocal fluorescence endomicroscopy (Cellvizio) for hilar biliary strictures.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A66
• 142 Lim L G, Mayr M, Alguel H et al. Cholangioscopy and probe-based confocal endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of an unusual liver cyst.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A67
• 143 Chen Y, Shah R, Slivka A et al. Miami classification (MC) of probe-based confocal endomicroscopy findings in indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures (PB-PCLE): combination MC criteria improves predictive value.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A88
• 144 Chen Y K, Pleskow D K. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 832-841
• 145 Fishman D S, Tarnasky P R, Patel S N et al. Management of pancreaticobiliary disease using a new intra-ductal endoscope: the Texas experience.  World J Gastroenterol. 2009;  15 1353-1358
• 146 Judah J R, Draganov P V. Intraductal biliary and pancreatic endoscopy: an expanding scope of possibility.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 3129-3136
• 147 Barkay O, Bucksot L, Sherman S. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage with the SpyGlass cholangiopancreatoscopy system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  70 1039-1040
• 148 Ransibrahmanakul K, Hasyagar C, Prindiville T. Removal of bile duct foreign body by using spyglass and spybite.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;  8 e9
• 149 Leblanc S, Duchmann J C, Boyer J et al. Combined cholangioscopy (Spyglass®) and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (P-CLE) in undetermined biliary stenosis: preliminary results.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A88
• 150 Xue A, Scarlett C J, Chung L et al. Discovery of serum biomarkers for pancreatic adenocarcinoma using proteomic analysis.  Br J Cancer. 2010;  103 391-400
• 151 Bonney G K, Craven R A, Prasad R et al. Circulating markers of biliary malignancy: opportunities in proteomics?.  Lancet Oncol. 2008;  9 149-158
• 152 Chung J W, Park J Y, Kim S A et al. Proteomics of pancreatic juice to find diagnostic biomarkers of pancreatic cancer.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A33
• 153 Zabron A, Horneffer-Van der Sluis V, Gierula M et al. Proteomic analysis of bile in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A33
• 154 Gincul R, Scoazec J-Y, Ponchon T et al. Endoscopic curative treatment of early ampullary tumors (ampullectomy). Long term results of a large multicenter prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A90
• 155 Bhati C S, Kubal C, Sihag P K et al. Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on outcome of classical pancreaticoduodenectomy.  World J Gastroenterol. 2007;  13 1240-1242
• 156 Velanovich V, Kheibek T, Khan M. Relationship of postoperative complications from preoperative biliary stents after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A new cohort analysis and meta-analysis of modern studies.  JOP. 2009;  10 24-29
• 157 Smith R A, Dajani K, Dodd S et al. Preoperative resolution of jaundice following biliary stenting predicts more favourable early survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.  Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;  15 3138-3146
• 158 Lawrence C, Howell D A, Conklin D E et al. Delayed pancreaticoduo­denectomy for cancer patients with prior ERCP-placed, nonforeshortening, self-expanding metal stents: a positive outcome.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 804-807
• 159 Mumtaz K, Hamid S, Jafri W. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with or without stenting in patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancy, prior to surgery.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;  ( (3).) CD006001
• 160 Coates J M, Beal S H, Russo J E et al. Negligible effect of selective pre­operative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.  Arch Surg. 2009;  144 841-847
• 161 Eshuis W J, Van der Gaag N A, Rauws E A et al. Therapeutic delay and survival after surgery for cancer of the pancreatic head with or without preoperative biliary drainage.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A33
• 162 Duclos A, Ben Soussan E, Antonietti M et al. Predictive factors of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicentre study.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A82
• 163 Ito K, Fujita N, Kanno A et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients at high risk who underwent prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement. A multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A82
• 164 Kobayashi G, Fujita N, Imaizumi K et al. Can a guidewire cannulation technique reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis? A multicenter randomized controlled trial.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A89
• 165 Cheung J, Tsoi K K, Quan W L et al. Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Gastro­intest Endosc. 2009;  70 1211-1219
• 166 Dumonceau J M, Andriulli A, Deviere J et al. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 503-515
• 167 Lee T H, Park do H, Park J Y et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 444-449
• 168 Sharma V K, Howden C W. Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 3211-3214
• 169 Moretti A, Papi C, Aratari A et al. Is early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography useful in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.  Dig Liver Dis. 2008;  40 379-385
• 170 Dubravcsik Z, Szepes A, Fejes R et al. Early ERCP and biliary sphincterotomy with or without small caliber pancreatic stent in patients with gallstone pancreatitis – nonrandomized, prospective, dual center trial.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl I) A89
• 171 Koornstra J J, Fry L, Mönkemüller K. ERCP with the balloon-assisted enteroscopy technique: a systematic review.  Dig Dis. 2008;  26 324-329
• 172 Shah R J, Smolkin M, Yen R et al. A multi-center, U.S. experience of single balloon, double balloon, and spiral overtube enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in long limb surgical bypass patients.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A88
• 173 Papanikolaou I S, Fockens P, Hawes R et al. Update on endoscopic ultrasound: how much for imaging, needling, or therapy?.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;  43 1416-1424
• 174 Shami V M, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholangiopancreatography and rendezvous techniques.  Dig Liver Dis. 2010;  42 419-424
• 175 Khashab M, Mokadem M, DeWitt J et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with or without flow cytometry for the diagnosis of primary pancreatic lymphoma – a case series.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 228-231
• 176 Philipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert H E et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 300-305
• 177 Möller K, Papanikolaou I S, Toermer T et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: high yield of 2 passes with combined histologic-cytologic analysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  70 60-69
• 178 Seo D W. EUS-guided antitumor therapy for pancreatic tumors.  Gut Liver. 2010;  4 Suppl 1 S76-S81
• 179 Ergun M, Aouattah T, Gillain C et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided transluminal drainage of pancreatic duct obstruction: long term outcome.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A5
• 180 Christiaens P, Moons V, D'Haens G et al. Transgastric biliary drainage.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 Suppl 1 A3
• 181 Perez-Miranda M, de la Serna C, Diez-Redondo P et al. Endo-sonog­raphy-guided cholangiopancreatography (ESCP) as the primary approach for ductal drainage after failed ERCP.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A6
• 182 Hara K, Yamao K, Niwa Y et al. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) for patients with malignant biliary obstruction.  Endos­copy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A6
• 183 Bories E, Almeido F, Pesenti C et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided hepaticogastrostomy: retrospective study and outcome in 44 patients.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A90
• 184 Seewald S, Ang T L, Teng K C et al. EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts, abscesses and infected necrosis.  Dig Endosc. 2009;  21 Suppl 1 S61-S65
• 185 Giovannini M, Araujo W, Coelho N et al. EUS-guided drainage of ­pancreatic pseudocyst and abscesses: an assessment of 109 patients.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A22
• 186 Roesch T, Papanikolaou I S, Ponchon T et al. Pilot study on the technical performance of a new forward viewing linear echoendoscope for FNA and cyst drainage.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 M1211
• 187 Voermans R P, Eisendrath P, Bruno M J et al. Initial evaluation of a novel prototype forward-viewing US endoscope in transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 1013-1017
• 188 Irisawa A, Imaizumi H, Hikichi T et al. Feasibility of interventional ­endoscopic ultrasound using forward-viewing and curved linear-array echoendoscope: a literature review.  Dig Endosc. 2010;  22 Suppl 1 S128-S131
• 189 Voermans R P, Ponchon T, Larghi A et al. Randomized controlled comparison of forward-viewing versus oblique-viewing EUS-scopes in drainage of pancreatic fluid collections.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A6
• 190 Pausawasdi N, Heidt D, Kwon R et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with incidentally discovered pancreatic cystic neoplasms evaluated by endoscopic ultrasound.  Surgery. 2010;  147 13-20
• 191 Ardengh J C, Coelho-Neto D E, Coelho J FE et al. Clinical impact of EUS-FNA in the management of the incidental pancreatic cysts. A prospective assessment.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A6
• 192 Attasaranya S, Pais S, LeBlanc J et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and cyst fluid analysis for pancreatic cysts.  JOP. 2007;  8 553-563
• 193 Zhang S, Defrias D V, Alasadi R et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA): experience of an academic centre in the USA.  Cytopathology. 2010;  21 35-43
• 194 Maire F, Voitot H, Aubert A et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: performance of pancreatic fluid analysis for positive diagnosis and the prediction of malignancy.  Am J Gastro­enterol. 2008;  103 2871-2877
• 195 Lee K S, Sekhar A, Rofsky N M et al. Prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population on MR imaging.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;  105 2079-2084
• 196 De Jong K, van Hooft J E, Poley J W et al. Accuracy of MRI and EUS in a prospective cohort of patients with histologically confirmed cystic ­lesions of the pancreas.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A27
• 197 Tan H K, Li M Q, Ling K L et al. EUS and pancreatic cyst fluid analysis in predicting potentially malignant/malignant cystic lesions of the pancreas.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A21
• 198 Sawai Y, Yamao K, Bhatia V et al. Development of pancreatic cancers during long-term follow-up of side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 1077-1084
• 199 Kubo H, Chijiiwa Y, Akahoshi K et al. Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas: differential diagnosis between benign and malignant tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 1429-1434
• 200 Aso A, Kubo H, Itaba S et al. Preoperative evaluation of benign or malignant intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A69
• 201 Maire F, Couvelard A, Palazzo L et al. From pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PANIN) to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN): what is the significance of endoscopic ultrasound findings?.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A34
• 202 Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez M V, Gincoul R et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: ­results of a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 564-570
• 203 Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Matsunaga K et al. Contrast-enhanced har­monic EUS with novel ultrasonographic contrast (Sonazoid) in the preoperative T-staging for pancreaticobiliary malignancies.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;  45 732-738
• 204 Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Kawashima H et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic dis­orders using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic elastography.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  7 (11 Suppl) S63-S67
• 205 Kitano M, Takagi T, Sakamoto H et al. Characterization of small pancreatic neoplasms by contrast enhanced harmonic EUS.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A68
• 206 Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Ikeda K et al. Novel quantitative perfusion analy­sis with contrast enhanced harmonic EUS facilitate distinguishing chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A69
• 207 Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F et al. Neural network analysis of ­dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential ­diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 1086-1094
• 208 Badaoui A, Borbath I, Aouattah T et al. Evaluation of pancreatic tumors with contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography and EUS-strain ratio elastography.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A69
• 209 Delius S von, Meining A. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 73-76
• 210 Dallemagne B, Perretta S. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 895-897
• 211 Rao G V, Reddy D N, Banerjee R. NOTES: human experience.  Gastro­intest Endosc Clin N Am. 2008;  18 361-370; x
• 212 Noguera J F, Cuadrado A, Sánchez-Margallo F M et al. Emergency transvaginal hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.  Endoscopy. DOI: DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256042
• 213 Cho W Y, Kim Y J, Cho J Y et al. Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: endoscopic full-thickness resection of early gastric cancer and laparoscopic regional lymph node dissection – 14 human cases.  Endoscopy. 2011;  43 134-139
• 214 Sugimoto M, Morita Y, Matsuoka Y et al. Stereo-3D navigated transgastric interventional EUS and NOTES using magnetic resonance ­endoscopy and magnetic scope detection system.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A16
• 215 Vilmann P, Bhutani M, Saftoiu A et al. Transgastric localization with dissection of the pancreatic tail by EUS-assisted NOTES: a feasibility study.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A15
• 216 Deprez P, Schroeven M, Chioccioli C et al. Successful management of a chronic tracheoesophageal fistula by a combination of ESD, matrix implantation and tracheal stenting.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A66
• 217 Kratt T, Stüker D, Feilitzsch M von et al. Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal perforations, severe hemorrhages and postoperative complications with a new over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) device: experiences with 63 patients.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A256
• 218 Guarner-Argente C, Córdova H, Martínez-Pallí G et al. Post-operative recovery after notes (transgastric, transcolonic and transvaginal) versus laparoscopy. A prospective and comparative study in a survival porcine model.  Gut. 2010;  59 (Suppl. III) A349
• 219 Delius S von, Schorn A, Grimm M et al. Natural orifice translumenal ­endoscopic surgery (NOTES): low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is sufficient for transgastric peritoneoscopy and results in an improved cardiopulmonary response (pressurepig study).  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 (Suppl. I) A373